After having my first child I was presented with the very
important question of whether I was going to vaccinate or not. My initial reaction to vaccinating my child
was in opposition, but I then began to think these medicines are in use for a
reason and I should probably know these reasons. Being from a family that was
against vaccinating I suddenly was forced to make my own decision on the matter.
I wanted to know what the big deal was about vaccinating children. Whenever I
would ask my mom what was wrong with vaccines she would always tell me it was because
they contained mercury. This might have been true 23 years ago but I thought
surely they had removed this ingredient by now. I decided to do some research
on the current controversies of vaccination to make an up to date decision on
the matter, after all it is my job to protect my baby I needed to know what the
best way of doing that would be.
I decided to begin my research by familiarizing myself with
the current concerns about vaccines. I chose a text titled “What Your Doctor May
Not Tell You about Children’s Vaccinations” By Stephanie Cave M.D., because it
seemed to be exactly what I was looking for. Cave begins by explaining that
some people are more prone to adverse reactions because of genetic make-up,
social environment and medical history. Most of the adverse effects of vaccines
are caused by the other ingredients such as aluminum salts benzethonium
chloride, ethylene glycol, formaldehyde, gelatin, neomycin, phenol,
streptomycin, and thimerosal. “ Since the introduction of mass immunization in
the 1950’s there has been an increase in immune system and neurological disorders”
(Cave 23). She states “there is much scientists don’t know about how vaccines
work on a cellular and molecular level” (23). According to the CDC, FDA, and AAP
vaccines are safe and “reflect the best available science”. But the truth is
there is very little research on the adverse effects of vaccines because the US
government does not recognize that there is any, attributing the reports of
adverse effects to coincidence and refusing to fund any studies. I found this information
perplexing because, how can they say it is safe without having any scientific evidence
to back it up?
I decided to look further into the controversy to gain a
little more incite about vaccines. I chose a book titled “The Vaccine Controversy”
By Kurt Link M.D. and found the chapter labeled “The Current Controversy in
Perspective”. Link began by stating that “vaccines work and are proven by
epidemiological studies, clinical trials and the recurrence of a disease when a
vaccine is discontinued” (39). He acknowledges that no vaccine works 100% of
the time. Link then points out that autism presents itself at the same age
children get vaccinated and asks if this is casualty of coincidence? Link points
out that currently there are no thimerosal (mercury) containing vaccines available
in the US, which is linked to cause autism. He then makes the observation, that
parents today do not have to deal with the devastating effects of the diseases
these vaccines prevent leaving the vaccine itself open to scrutinization.
Link closes with the question, “How many infections or deaths prevented justify
a death from a vaccine?” (40). I found myself rethinking my own stand point on
vaccines after I read this. Naturally I would not want my child to have an
adverse reaction, however I really would not want my child to contract a
preventable disease because of the small chance they might have a negative
reaction.
I then wanted to find out more about how common adverse reactions
were, so did an advanced search using the phrase “frequency of adverse
reactions to vaccines”. I then selected a module from the World Health
Organization (WHO). I found a comprehensive chart that highlighted the occurrence
of adverse reactions are less than 1% of all people vaccinated, and were mostly
allergic reactions that were not fatal. I also observed that although the frequency
of an adverse reaction might be minute, the correlating loss of confidence in
the vaccine causes less people to get the vaccine. This in turn is followed by
an outbreak of the disease. So the chance of suffering an adverse reaction is
less than the chance you will get struck by lightning, and not getting
vaccinated actually contributes to an outbreak, getting vaccinated is looking
to the smarter option.
Referring back to the first text, I am left questioning what
the government is contributing to the safety of vaccines. I found an article
titled “History of Vaccine safety” Published by the Center for Disease Control
(CDC). This article highlighted the history and protocol of vaccine safety. In response
to a lawsuit against the DTP vaccine in the 1970’s the US congress passed the
National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA). This act coordinates the
Department of Health and Human Services, the Center for Disease Control, the
Food and Drug Administration and other organizations to share their research among
each other, allowing for better research on the adverse effects of each
vaccine. Thorough research is conducted consisting of animal testing, volunteer
testing of a few hundred to eventually a few thousand. These studies may take
up to 10 years before they are submitted to the FDA for licensing. After the vaccine
has been approved and licensed for public use the manufacture must continue to
submit samples of each lot to the FDA for testing. In the last 10 years the FDA
has only recalled 3 lots due to mislabeling, contamination, and a manufacturing
problem. If an adverse reaction is suspected, the CDC and FDA established the
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) which is a database dedicated to
receiving the adverse effect to be determined as “true” or coincidence. It seems
to me the safety of any given vaccine is of the up most importance to the
government, according to the CDCs information.
After conducting my own research on the topic of
vaccinations, my original opposition has begun to sway more towards the pro
side of the argument. I now understand the fears of adverse reactions being
life threatening and in some cases crippling. However these cases are very rare
and mostly effect people that have preexisting medical conditions. The fear of
autism has been laid to rest after the discovery of the removal of mercury from
vaccines. Being faced with the thought that my abstaining from vaccination might
actually cause more harm than I am avoiding leads me to believe that vaccinating
my child is no more dangerous than driving down the street with her in the car.
I will still have to give it a little more thought before I rush off to the
doctors but now I feel pretty well informed on the safety of vaccines.
Works Cited
Cave, Stephanie, and Deborah R. Mitchell. What Your
Doctor May Not Tell You about Children's Vaccinations. New York: Wellness
Central, 2010. Print.
Link, Kurt. "The Current Controversy: In
Perspective." The Vaccine Controversy: The History, Use, and Safety of
Vaccinations. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2005. 38-40. Print.
"World Vaccine Safety in Immunization
Programmes." MODULE 1 รข Vaccine Safety in Immunization
Programmes. World Health Organization, n.d. Web. 14 Oct. 2014.
<http://vaccine-safety-training.org/vaccine-safety-in-immunization-programmes.html>.
"History
of Vaccine Safety." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 08 Feb. 2011. Web. 12 Oct. 2014.